🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.